• Prop.1 - NO

  •  

  • Prop.2 - NO

  •  

  • Prop.3 - NO

  •  

  • Prop.4 - NP

  •  

  • Prop.5 - YES

  •  

  • Prop.6 - YES

  •  

  • Prop.7 - NO

  •  

  • Prop.8 - NO

  •  

  • Prop.10- NO

  •  

  • Prop.11- YES

"You can not help men permenatly by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves"

              - Abraham Lincoln

State Measures


1. NO


AUTHORIZES BONDS TO FUND SPECIFIED HOUSING ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $4 billion in general obligation bonds for existing affordable housing programs for low-income residents, veterans, farmworkers, manufactured and mobile homes, infill, and transit-oriented housing. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging about $170 million annually over the next 35 years.
 

 

2. NO


AUTHORIZES BONDS TO FUND EXISTING HOUSING PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH MENTAL ILLNESS. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Amends Mental Health Services Act to fund No Place Like Home Program, which finances housing for individuals with mental illness. Ratifies existing law establishing the No Place Like Home Program. Fiscal Impact: Allows the state to use up to $140 million per year of county mental health funds to repay up to $2 billion in bonds. These bonds would fund housing for those with mental illness who are homeless.

 

3. NO


AUTHORIZES BONDS TO FUND PROJECTS FOR WATER SUPPLY AND QUALITY, WATERSHED, FISH, WILDLIFE, WATER CONVEYANCE, AND GROUNDWATER SUSTAINABILITY AND STORAGE. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $8.877 billion in state general obligation bonds for various infrastructure projects. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging $430 million per year over 40 years. Local government savings for water-related projects, likely averaging a couple hundred million dollars annually over the next few decades.

 

4. NP

 

AUTHORIZES BONDS FUNDING CONSTRUCTION AT HOSPITALS PROVIDING CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes $1.5 billion in bonds, to be repaid from state's General Fund, to fund grants for construction, expansion, renovation, and equipping of  qualifying children's hospitals. Fiscal Impact: Increased state costs to repay bonds averaging about $80 million annually over the next 35 years.

5. YES

CHANGES REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNERS TO TRANSFER THEIR PROPERTY TAX BASE TO REPLACEMENT PROPERTY. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND STATUTE. Removes certain transfer requirements for homeowners over 55, severely disabled homeowners, and contaminated or disaster-destroyed property. Fiscal Impact: Schools and local governments each would lose over $100 million in annual property taxes early on, growing to about $1 billion per year. Similar increase in state costs to backfill school property tax losses.

 

6. YES

ELIMINATES CERTAIN ROAD REPAIR AND TRANSPORTATION FUNDING. REQUIRES CERTAIN FUEL TAXES AND VEHICLE FEES BE APPROVED BY THE ELECTORATE. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT. Repeals a 2017 transportation law's taxes and fees designated for road repairs and public transportation. Fiscal Impact: Reduced ongoing revenues of $5.1 billion from state fuel and vehicle taxes that mainly would have paid for highway and road maintenance and repairs, as well as transit programs.

 

7. NO

CONFORMS CALIFORNIA DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME TO FEDERAL LAW. ALLOWS LEGISLATURE TO CHANGE DAYLIGHT SAVING TIME PERIOD. LEGISLATIVE STATUTE. Gives Legislature ability to change daylight saving time period by two-thirds vote, if changes are consistent with federal law. Fiscal Impact: This measure has no direct fiscal effect because changes to daylight saving time would depend on future actions by the Legislature and potentially the federal government.

 

8. NO

REGULATES AMOUNTS OUTPATIENT KIDNEY DIALYSIS CLINICS CHARGE FOR DIALYSIS TREATMENT. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Requires rebates and penalties if charges exceed limit. Requires annual reporting to the state. Prohibits clinics from refusing to treat patients based on payment source. Fiscal Impact: Overall annual effect on state and local governments ranging from net positive impact in the low tens of millions of dollars to net negative impact in the tens of millions of dollars.

 

9. *Removed from the Ballot by California Supreme Court.

 

10. NO

 

EXPANDS LOCAL GOVERNMENTS' AUTHORITY TO ENACT RENT CONTROL ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Repeals state law that currently restricts the scope of rent-control policies that cities and other local jurisdictions may impose on residential property. Fiscal Impact: Potential net reduction in state and local revenues of tens of millions of dollars per year in the long term. Depending on actions by local communities, revenue losses could be less or considerably more.

 

11. YES

REQUIRES PRIVATE-SECTOR EMERGENCY AMBULANCE 11 EMPLOYEES ELIMINATES TO REMAIN CERTAIN ON-CALL DURING WORK EMPLOYER LIABILITY. BREAKS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Law entitling hourly employees to breaks without being on-call would not apply to private-sector ambulance employees. Fiscal Impact: Likely fiscal benefit to local governments (in the form of lower costs and higher revenues), potentially in the tens of millions of dollars each year.

 

12. NO

ESTABLISHES NEW STANDARDS FOR 12 CONFINEMENT OF SPECIFIED NONCOMPLYING PRODUCTS. FARM ANIMALS; BANS INITIATIVE STATUTE. SALE OF Establishes minimum requirements for confining certain farm animals. Prohibits sales of meat and egg products from animals confined in noncomplying manner. Fiscal Impact: Potential decrease in state income tax revenues from farm businesses, likely not more than several million dollars annually. State costs up to $10 million annually to enforce the measure.

Los Angeles COUNTY MEASURE – (1)      

 

FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT (1)

 

W – Los Angeles Region’s Public Health and Safe, Clean Water Program.

 

Shall an ordinance
improving/protecting water quality; capturing rain/stormwater to increase safe drinking water
supplies and prepare for future drought; protecting public health and marine life by reducing
pollution, trash, toxins/plastics entering Los Angeles County waterways/bays/beaches;
establishing a parcel tax of 2.5¢ per square foot of impermeable area, exempting low-income
seniors, raising approximately $300,000,000 annually until ended by voters, requiring
independent audits, oversight and local control be adopted?

Vote No on All three

LOS ANGELES CITY (2)
B – MUNICIPAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTION. CHARTER AMENDMENT B. Shall the City Charter be
amended to allow the City to establish a municipal financial institution or bank?

E – REALIGN CITY AND STATE ELECTION DATES. CHARTER AMENDMENT E. Shall the City
Charter be amended to realign the City’s primary election date with the State’s primary election
held in March of even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to City
election procedures?

LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (1)
EE – REALIGN LOS ANGELES UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT (LAUSD) AND STATE ELECTION
DATES. CHARTER AMENDMENT EE. Shall the City Charter be amended to realign the LAUSD
Board of Education’s primary election date with the State’s primary election held in March of
even-numbered years, and make other related and technical changes to LAUSD election
procedures?

Vote NO

Site designed by Art of the Light